SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46763

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AKTIEBOLAGET VOLVO & ORS. VS. GOBIND MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
CS(COMM) 1420/2025



##PAGE1##

$~41

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 1420/2025 & I.As. 32677-79/2025

VASUNDHRA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD. .....Plaintiff

Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Advocate

with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Ms. Aarushi

Jain, Mr. Yojit Pareek, Ms. Ankita,

Mr. Prassant Kumar Sharma, Mr.

Chetan, Ms. Pratibha Singh, Mr. Ritik

Raghuwanshi, Ms. Rishika Aggarwal

and Ms. Shrudula Murthy, Advocates

versus

DELPHINIUM VENTURES .....Defendant

Through: Mr. Ravinder Vikram Singh, Mr.

V.K. Singh and Mr. Kunal Pal,

Advocates

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 23.12.2025

I.A. 32680/2025 (for exemption)

1. This application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,

1908 [‘CPC’] has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking exemption from filing

the clear copies/true typed copes of dim/illegible documents.

2. Subject to the Plaintiff filing the clear copies/true typed copes of

dim/illegible documents within a period of thirty [30] days from today,

exemption is granted for the present, failing which, the Plaintiff will not be

entitled to rely upon these documents.

3. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

CS(COMM) 1420/2025 Page 1 of 5

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 22:25:40

##PAGE2##

I.A. 32679/2025 (seeking exemption from institution pre-litigation

mediation)

4. This is an application under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts

Act, 2015 read with Section 151 CPC, filed by the Plaintiff seeking

exemption from instituting pre-litigation mediation.

5. Having regard to the facts that the present suit contemplates urgent

interim relief and in light of the judgement of the Supreme Court in Yamini

Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi, (2024) 5 SCC 815, exemption from the requirement of pre-

institution mediation is granted to the plaintiff.

6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 32678/2025 (Under Order XI Rule 1(4) CPC)

7. This is an application seeking leave to file additional documents under

Order XI Rule 1(4) of CPC [as amended by the Commercial Courts Act,

2015] read with Section 151 CPC, within thirty [30] days.

8. The Plaintiff, if it wishes to file additional documents will file the

same within thirty (30) days from today, and it shall do so strictly as per the

provisions of the Commercial Courts Act and the Delhi High Court

(Original Side) Rules, 2018.

9. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

CS(COMM) 1420/2025

10. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.

11. Issue summons.

12. Mr. Ravinder Vikram Singh, learned counsel on behalf of the

Defendant accepts summons.

12.1. He confirms the receipt of the suit paper book and waives the right of

CS(COMM) 1420/2025 Page 2 of 5

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 22:25:40

##PAGE3##

formal service of summons. He states that his Vakalatnama has already been

e-filed. He is directed to have the same placed on record.

13. The Defendant will file the written statement within six [6] weeks.

The Defendant shall also file affidavit(s) of admission/denial of the

documents filed by the Plaintiff, failing which the written statement shall not

be taken on record.

14. The Plaintiff is at liberty to file replication thereto within four [4]

weeks after filing of the written statement. The replication shall be

accompanied by affidavit of admission/denial in respect of the documents

filed by the Defendant, failing which the replication shall not be taken on

record.

15. It is made clear that any unjustified denial of documents may lead to

an order of costs against the concerned party.

16. Any party seeking inspection of documents may do so in accordance

with the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018.

17. List before the learned Joint Registrar (J) for completion of pleadings

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top