IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GET OUT SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. VS. MR RAJEEV MALHOTRA & ORS.
CS(COMM) 895/2024
##PAGE1##
$~51
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(COMM) 895/2024
VALSAD DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS
UNION LTD .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Mr. J. Amal
Anand, Mr. Elvin Joshy, Ms. Shivani
Kalra, Mr. K.V. Vibu Prasad and Mr.
Ayush Soni, Advs.
versus
M TECK FOODS & ANR. .....Defendants
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 23.12.2025
1. This is a suit filed for permanent and mandatory injunction, trademark
and copyright infringement, passing off, damages, and other ancillary
reliefs.
2. The Plaintiff- a district Co-operative Milk Producers’ Union, is the
registered proprietor of the trademark /VASUDHARA
[‘Plaintiff’s mark and trade dress’] and has been using the same since 1988.
This is also the trade dress of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is engaged in the
business of marketing and selling ghee under the said mark and trade dress.
CS(COMM) 895/2024 Page 1 of 8
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 22:27:37
##PAGE2##3. The Plaintiff has registration for the said device mark
in Class 29 bearing TM No. 1249641, application dated
14.11.2003, with user claim since 31.10.2003. Details of Plaintiff’s various
trademark registrations for its mark VASUDHARA have been set out in
paragraph ‘41’ of the plaint.
4. The Plaintiff’s turnover for the year 2023-2024 was approximately
Rs. 88.38 crores.
Knowledge about Defendant No.1’s infringement
5. In June 2024, the Plaintiff learnt that Defendant No.1 had been using
VASTUDHARA/ [‘impugned mark and trade dress’] for
its pure ghee product, with a deceptively similar mark and trade dress to
Plaintiff’s registered mark and trade dress, which was being sold on the
platform of Defendant No.2/Amazon.
6. Defendant No.1 has also applied for the registration of the wordmark
‘VASTUDHARA’ bearing TM no. 5885639 in Class 29, application dated
10.04.2023, on a proposed-to-be-used basis; however, the application is
under objection.
7. It is stated that the products sold by the Defendant No. 1 under the
impugned mark and trade dress are adulterated, substandard and non-
CS(COMM) 895/2024 Page 2 of 8
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 22:27:37
##PAGE3##compliant with FSSAI, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. standards. Testing by NDDB, National Dairy Development Board CALF3 Ltd. [a
NABL, National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories-accredited FSSAI-recognized laboratory], revealed non-compliance
with the prescribed fatty acid profile and 13-sitosterol parameters, with the
presence of β-sitosterol indicating adulteration with vegetable fats.
Accordingly, the product cannot be classified as ghee or pure ghee and is in
violation of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
8. It is stated that Defendant No.1 is intentionally and fraudulently
deceiving consumers and the public at large, who purchase its products
under the bona fide belief that they originate from the Plaintiff’s
VASUDHARA brand, but are instead supplied with cheap, adulterated and
substandard products, thereby affecting the reputation and goodwill of the
Plaintiff. It also jeopardises the health and safety of consumers and the
public at large.
9. Despite the issuance of a cease-and-desist notice dated 24.06.2024,
Defendant No.1 continued its infringing activities. Aggrieved by the same,
the Plaintiff has filed the present suit.
Submissions on behalf of the Plaintiff
10. Mr. Abhishek Singh, learned counsel for the Plaintiff, states that the
Plaintiff is only pressing for reliefs of permanent injunction against
Defendant No. 1 as prayed for at paragraph 79 (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) of
the plaint.
10.1. He states that the Plaintiff is not pressing for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.