Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMRIK SINGH KHURANA & ANR VS. SARDAR JOGINDER SINGH SONI (DECEASED) THR LRS
$~68
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RC.REV. 53/2020, CM APPL. 3124/2020, CM APPL. 42988/2021
SUNITA TANDON .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Ms. Ayushi
Chugh and Mr. Vishal Baliya,
Advs. versus
HARISH KUMAR SETHI & ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Jugal Wadhwa, Mr. Rishabh
Wadhwa, Mr. Raghav Goyal and Mr. Vatsal S. Chadha, Advs. for
respondents.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R
% 23.12.2025
1. This Court, after hearing argument for and behalf of both the parties at length on 04.12.2025, passed a speaking order, relevant extract whereof
are as under:
“1. By virtue of the present petition, the petitioner/ tenant seeks setting aside of the order dated 19.11.2019 (impugned order), passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (learned ARC) in ARC No.286/2022 filed by the respondent no.1/ landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act) seeking eviction of the premises being one shop situated on the Ground Floor of the property bearing No.H-31, Rajouri Garden,
New Delhi (subject premises).
2. Though the tenant has raised various grounds, however, learned counsel for the tenant has primari
The court affirmed the bona fide requirement of a landlord for personal residence, placing the onus on the tenant to establish any alternative accommodation's suitability, which was not proven.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
