SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46810

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD VS. ITC LTD


$~41

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 164/2025, I.A. 4947/2025, I.A. 11880/2025, I.A.

21589/2025 & I.A. 32573/2025

NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC. .....Plaintiff

Through: Ms. Anuja Chaudhary & Ms. Adhya,

Advocates.

versus

ANKIT GUPTA AND ANR. .....Defendants

Through: Ms. Shreya Gagneja, Advocate

(through VC).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

O R D E R

% 23.12.2025

I.A. 32573/2025

1. This is a joint Application filed by the Parties under Order XXIII Rule

3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

2. The learned Counsel for the Parties submitted that during the pendency of the present Suit, the Parties have been able to amicably settle the disputes in the present Suit on the following terms (“Terms of

Settlement”):

“2. The parties submit that during the pendency of the suit, the Plaintiff and the Defendants have arrived at an amicable settlement on the following terms and conditions, without prejudice to their

respective rival contentions:

a. This settlement agreement binds the Plaintiff, its affiliated

companies, distributors and franchisees, as well as the Defendant No. 1, Ankit Gupta, trading as Anvik International, and the Defendant No. 2, Shankar Lal, trading

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top