IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
S.K DAS VS. DOYELI SANYAL & ORS
$~47
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(COMM) 222/2025
PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL INC. .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna & Mr. Krtin
Bhasin, Advocates.
versus
VISHISHT MALIK TRADING AS M/S PACHRANGA FOOD
INDUSTRIES .....Defendant
Through: Mr. Rishub Kapoor, Advocate
(through VC).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
O R D E R
% 23.12.2025
I.A. 32190/2025
1. This is an Application under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) filed by the Plaintiff for
appointment of Local Commissioner.
2. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that vide order dated 11.03.2025, an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was granted and a Local Commissioner was appointed to visit the Defendant’s premises with directions to conduct a search and seizure of the infringing goods and to
prepare an inventory thereof.
3. It was submitted that in compliance with the aforesaid order, the Local Commission was executed on 18.03.2025 and during the Commission, about 34,631 infringing materials were seized as mentioned in the Report of the Local Commissioner dated 31.03.2025. The Report also mentions that a specific area was designated at the premises located at TDI Cit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.