SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46811

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
S.K DAS VS. DOYELI SANYAL & ORS


$~47

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 222/2025

PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL INC. .....Plaintiff

Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna & Mr. Krtin

Bhasin, Advocates.

versus

VISHISHT MALIK TRADING AS M/S PACHRANGA FOOD

INDUSTRIES .....Defendant

Through: Mr. Rishub Kapoor, Advocate

(through VC).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

O R D E R

% 23.12.2025

I.A. 32190/2025

1. This is an Application under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) filed by the Plaintiff for

appointment of Local Commissioner.

2. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that vide order dated 11.03.2025, an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was granted and a Local Commissioner was appointed to visit the Defendant’s premises with directions to conduct a search and seizure of the infringing goods and to

prepare an inventory thereof.

3. It was submitted that in compliance with the aforesaid order, the Local Commission was executed on 18.03.2025 and during the Commission, about 34,631 infringing materials were seized as mentioned in the Report of the Local Commissioner dated 31.03.2025. The Report also mentions that a specific area was designated at the premises located at TDI Cit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top