IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
OM PRAKASH VS. MOHD. MEHRAJ @ MOHD. MAIRAJ & ORS.
MAC.APP. 813/2025
##PAGE1##
$~32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAC.APP. 813/2025
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate.
versus
RANGITA AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 22.12.2025
CM APPL. 81210/2025 (for exemption
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
MAC.APP. 813/2025 & CM APPL. 81209/2025 (for stay
1. The appellant – Reliance General Insurance Company Limited
[“Insurance Company”] is in appeal against an award of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal [“Tribunal”] dated 27.09.2025, in MACT No.
519/2013, whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 49,57,000/-,
alongwith interest at the rate of 8% per annum, in favour of respondent
Nos. 1 to 4 – claimants.
2. Issue notice. Notice be served upon respondent Nos. 1 to 4 by all
permissible modes, additionally through learned counsel appearing on
their behalf before the Tribunal. As no recovery rights have been granted
to the Insurance Company against the owner and driver of the vehicle,
MAC.APP. 813/2025 Page 1 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 00:38:08
##PAGE2##service upon respondent No. 5 is dispensed with.
3. The challenge of the Insurance Company is limited to the
quantification of the income of the deceased, on the basis of which the
loss of dependency has been computed.
4. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the Insurance Company,
refers to the salary slip of the deceased, which has been annexed to the
appeal as Annexure A2, to submit as follows:
a. That certain allowances are included in the salary slip, which ought
to have been deducted from the income of the deceased.
b. That the Tribunal has not deducted any taxes.
c. That the Tribunal has taken income to be Rs. 30,000/- per month,
whereas, even inclusive of allowances, the monthly income of the
deceased was Rs.27,500/- per month.
5. The Trial Court record be summoned, and an electronic copy
thereof be placed on the file of this appeal.
6. Upon the Insurance Company depositing the entire awarded
amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, with the Tribunal within a period
of six weeks from today, execution of the impugned award shall remain
stayed.
7. Having regard to the aforesaid grounds taken by Mr. Gupta, 70%
of the awarded amount be released to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 [claimants
before the Tribunal] in accordance with the disbursement scheme
provided in the impugned award.
8. Written submissions to the appeal be filed by the parties, with
reference to the electronic record of the Court, alongwith copies of any
relevant judgments which they wish to rely upon, within eight weeks
MAC.APP. 813/2025 Page 2 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 00:38:08
##PAGE3##from today.
9. List before the Registrar on 24.03.2026.
10. List before the Court on 26.05.2026.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
DECEMBER 22, 2025
‘pv/KA’/
MAC.APP. 813/2025 Page 3 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 00:38:08
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.