$~10

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ARB.P. 1828/2025

SATYA RAM .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Mihir Garg, Ms. Rashi Jain,

Advocates.

versus

DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION LTD & ANR. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025

1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for

adjudication of disputes between the parties arising out of

2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent floated a tender for

creating of record room in office complex in District Magistrate at Jam Nagar House, New Delhi. The petitioner being a successful bidder was awarded the said work vide letter bearing Np.

DTTDC/Engg./1(196)/EE(SP)/357.

3. The arbitration clause is Clause No. 25 of General Conditions of

Contract which reads as under:

“....

(ii) Except where the decision has become final, binding and conclusive in terms of Sub Para (i) above, disputes or difference shall be referred for adjudication through arbitration by a sole arbitrator appointed by the Chief

Engineer, CPWD, in charge of the work or if there be no Chief Engineer;