$~63

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 991/2025

TRANS IMAGE CORPORATION .....Petitioner

Through: (appearance not given)

versus

NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION

.....Respondent

Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Adv. for NTRO

Ms. Yashaswi Sk Chocksey, GP for

UOI

Dr. B. Ramaswamy, CGSC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025

1. This is a petition filed under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration

and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator by a period of 4 months for making and publishing the

award.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the present case, the

first Award was passed on 02.08.2025, prior to the expiry of the mandate of the Arbitrator i.e. 05.08.2025 . There were clerical errors. Therefore, the petitioner moved an application under Section 33 of the 1996 Act on 13.08.2025. However, on that day, the mandate of

Arbitrator had already expired. Hence, the present application.

3. Dr. B.Ramaswamy, learned CGSC for respondent, states that petition

under Section 34 of the 1996 Act has already been filed. However, the facts remains that the Arbitrator has passed the Award dated 02.08.2025 prior t