SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46903

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JITENDRA CHOUKSEY & ANR. VS. AMAN DUGGAL


$~78

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

I.A. 32130/2025

IN

+ CS(OS) 349/2025

SMT. SUNITA RANI .....Plaintiff

Through: Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, Mr. Amogh

Bansal, Mr. Arpit Bansal and Mr.

Kapil Raghav, Adv.

versus

SH. KARAN SINGH & ORS. .....Defendants

Through: Mr. Vivek Bhardwaj, Adv. for D-1

Mr. Vidit Gupta, Adv. for D-3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025

I.A. 32130/2025 (seeking rejection of plaint)

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of defendant no.1 under Order VII Rule 11(a), (b) and (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure,

1908 (‘CPC’), seeking rejection of the plaint.

2. The grounds under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as stated in the application

are as follows:

i. The cause of action in the present suit is based on false and

fabricated facts and the suit is barred by limitation.

ii. The plaintiff has over-valued the property for the purposes of

possession at a sum of Rs.2,21,00,000/- without providing any

basis for the same.

iii. The subject matter of the suit is identical with previous suit being CS No.784/2022 pending before the Court of District Judge, Shahdara, District Karkardooma Courts.

3. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking possession, alon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top