##PAGE1##

$~60

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 18866/2025 & CM APPL. 81367/2025

SH. ASHOK KUMAR MEHTA .....Petitioner

Through: Ms. Mansi Mehta, Sr. Adv.

Mob: 9910182240

Email: mmlawoffice03@gmail.com

versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv., with Mr.

Shiva m Jasra, Mr. Kartik Jasra, Mr.

Deepank Yadav, Mr. Nishant Goyal,

Mr. Nakul Khanna, Mr. Hari Pratap

Singh and Ms. Riya Khandelwal,

Advs. for R-3 & 4.

Mob: 9911610070

Email: office@jnjlawoffices.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025

CM APPL. 81367/2025

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 3

and 4, seeking vacation of the status quo order dated 12th December, 2025,

qua the property bearing No. N-60½ , 100 square yards, Kirti Nagar, New

Delhi-110015.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 01:32:22

##PAGE2##

2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 3 and 4

submits that respondent nos. 3 and 4 have also applied for regularization on

19^th December, 2025. He, thus, submits that the regularization application of

respondent nos. 3 and 4 be duly considered by the Municipal Corporation of

Delhi (“MCD”).

3. Issue Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsels appearing for the

petitioner and respondent nos. 1 and 2.

4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1-MCD submits that

the regularization application of the respondent nos. 3 and 4, has already

been rejected today, i.e., 22^nd December, 2025. He has further handed over

to this Court a copy of the Show Cause Notice dated 22^nd December, 2025,

and submits that due action shall be taken as per law.

5. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 3

and 4 submits that since the application for regularization has been rejected

by the MCD today, i.e., 22nd December, 2025, the respondent nos. 3 and 4

shall seek their remedies against the said rejection, in accordance with law.

6. The aforesaid statement is taken note of.

7. Needless to state, as and when, any such challenge is made to the

rejection of the regularization application, the same shall be considered, in

accordance with law.

8. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this stage, has

handed over to this Court, photographs of the property in question, which

are reproduced as under:

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 01:32:22

##PAGE3##

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 01:32:22

##PAGE4##

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 01:32:22

##PAGE5##

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/01/2026 at 01:32:22

##PAGE6##

9. By referring to the aforesaid photographs, learned Senior Counsel

appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier the property in question

existed only till the ground floor and first floor. However, now the property

has been constructed till the fifth floor. She, thus, submits that the whole

property is unauthorized.

10. She further submits that the present is a case of sub-division of the

property.

11. Accordingly, let replies be filed by the non-applicants, within a period

of four weeks, from today.

12. MCD is also at liberty to inspect the property of the petitioner, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document