SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR. SUNIL GAVASKAR VS. CRICKET TAK (CRICKETTAK557) AND ORS


$~58

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 1336/2025 & I.A. 31232-31235/2025

MR KONIDALA PAWAN KALYAN .....Plaintiff

Through: J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Himanshu Deora, Mr. Rahul Mehta, Mr. Arpit Choudhary, Mr. Krumal Mehta, Ms. Anupriya Alok, Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, Mr. Sanat, Ms. Shambhavi Bhardwaj, Ms. Karen

Koya and Ms. Dhwani Vora, Advs.

Versus

ASHOK KUMAR JOHN DOE & ORS. .....Defendants

Through: Ms. Shilpa Gupta and Ms. Surabhi

Pande, Advs. for D-2

Ms. Srishti Dhoundiyal, Advocate for

D-3

Ms. Mishthi Dubey, Adv. for D-4

Mr. Aditya Gupta, Ms. Vani Kaushik and Mr. Rohith Venkatesan, Advs. for

D-5

Mr. Varun Pathak, Mr. Yash Karunakaran and Ms. Varsha Jhavar,

Advs. for D-6

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025

I.A. 31233/2025

1. This application under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 [‘CPC’] [as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015] has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking leave to file additional

documents within a period of thirty [30] days.

2. The Plaintiff, if it wishes to file additional documents will file the same within a period of thirty [30] days from today, and it shall do so strictly as per the provisi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top