IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR. SUNIL GAVASKAR VS. CRICKET TAK (CRICKETTAK557) AND ORS
$~58
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(COMM) 1336/2025 & I.A. 31232-31235/2025
MR KONIDALA PAWAN KALYAN .....Plaintiff
Through: J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Adv. with Mr.
Himanshu Deora, Mr. Rahul Mehta, Mr. Arpit Choudhary, Mr. Krumal Mehta, Ms. Anupriya Alok, Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, Mr. Sanat, Ms. Shambhavi Bhardwaj, Ms. Karen
Koya and Ms. Dhwani Vora, Advs.
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR JOHN DOE & ORS. .....Defendants
Through: Ms. Shilpa Gupta and Ms. Surabhi
Pande, Advs. for D-2
Ms. Srishti Dhoundiyal, Advocate for
D-3
Ms. Mishthi Dubey, Adv. for D-4
Mr. Aditya Gupta, Ms. Vani Kaushik and Mr. Rohith Venkatesan, Advs. for
D-5
Mr. Varun Pathak, Mr. Yash Karunakaran and Ms. Varsha Jhavar,
Advs. for D-6
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 22.12.2025
I.A. 31233/2025
1. This application under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 [‘CPC’] [as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015] has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking leave to file additional
documents within a period of thirty [30] days.
2. The Plaintiff, if it wishes to file additional documents will file the same within a period of thirty [30] days from today, and it shall do so strictly as per the provisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.