IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAUD NASIR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR. – Respondent
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21st January 2026 + CM(M) 161/2026 SAUD NASIR AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Visheshwar Shrivastav, Adv.
versus LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR.
.....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
ORDER (Oral)
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.
1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 4012/2026 & CM APPL. 4013/2026 (Exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of.
CM(M) 161/2026 & CM APPL. 4011/2026 (for Stay)
3. The present petition has been filed by petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking the following relief: “a) Issue notice to the Counsel for Respondent No. 1 and other Respondents; and b) Set aside the order dated 12/01/2026 and expunge the Examination in Chief & Cross Examination of OW-3 [Petitioner No. 2]; and c) Direct the Ld. ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (South-East) to conduct a de nova Examination in Chief of Petitioner No. 2”
4. Heard. Record perused.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the evidence of the OW-3 was record in his absence as he was unable to appear in the court. B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.