SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1187

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAUD NASIR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR. – Respondent


$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21st January 2026 + CM(M) 161/2026 SAUD NASIR AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Visheshwar Shrivastav, Adv.

versus LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

ORDER (Oral)

Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

CM APPL. 4012/2026 & CM APPL. 4013/2026 (Exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of.

CM(M) 161/2026 & CM APPL. 4011/2026 (for Stay)

3. The present petition has been filed by petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking the following relief: “a) Issue notice to the Counsel for Respondent No. 1 and other Respondents; and b) Set aside the order dated 12/01/2026 and expunge the Examination in Chief & Cross Examination of OW-3 [Petitioner No. 2]; and c) Direct the Ld. ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (South-East) to conduct a de nova Examination in Chief of Petitioner No. 2”

4. Heard. Record perused.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the evidence of the OW-3 was record in his absence as he was unable to appear in the court. B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top