SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1208

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ORIENTAL FOUNDRY PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


$~46 & 58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21.01.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 413/2025 & I.A. 24897/2025 (Seeking exemption from filing clear copies of dim documents)

ORIENTAL FOUNDRY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R. Sudhinder, Mr. Ashish Mukhi, Mr. Sanidhya Sonthalia & Mr. Kanishk Pandey, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashank Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Kunal Raj, Adv.

58 + ARB.P. 150/2026 & I.A. 1707/2026 (Ex. From filing clear copies of dim documents)

ORIENTAL FOUNDRY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R. Sudhinder, Mr. Ashish Mukhi, Mr. Sanidhya Sonthalia & Mr. Kanishk Pandey, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

ARB.P. 150/2026

1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, [“the Act”] seeks appointment of an arbitrator in terms of the arbitration clause, being clause 18 under a Contract No. 2022/RS(I)/954/151/1884, dated 10.02.2022, for manufacture and supply of wagons. Clause 18 of the Contract reads as under:

“18.0 Settlement of Disputes (Arb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top