SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1217

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ALAUDDIN @ SHAKEEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 16.01.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 20.01.2026 + CRL.A. 328/2018 ALAUDDIN @ SHAKEEL .....Appellant Through: Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocate (DHCLSC).

versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Urvashi, PS – Sonia Vihar.

Mr. Luv Manan, Advocate for respondent no. 2.

Counsel for DSLSA (appearance not given).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

JUDGMENT

CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.

1. This appeal under Section 374(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(the Cr.PC) has been filed by the first accused (A1) in S.C No. 09/2017 on the file of the Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012,(the PoCSO Act) Karkardooma, North East District, Delhi, assailing the judgment dated 05.02.2018 as per which he has been convicted of the offences punishable under Section 10 of the PoCSO Act and Section 506 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC). The second accused (A2) has been acquitted by the trial court.

2. The case of the prosecution is that two months before

17/10/2016, A1 and A2 wrongfully confined PW1 to 3 in a room in house No. C-1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top