$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 15^th January, 2026 Date of Decision: 19^th January, 2026 + CM(M) 849/2025, CM APPL. 27316/2025 & CM APPL.

27317/2025 JAI PARKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Verma and Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocates.

versus SATPAL LUTHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Singh Tanwar, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

O R D E R

1. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 17^th January, 2025 (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned order”) passed by the trial court in case bearing no. 2 RC ARC 933/16, whereby the application filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘DRC Act’) has been disposed of as withdrawn.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order has been passed on the basis of surmises and conjectures and is against the law. The respondent has withdrawn the application in a deceitful manner by misusing process of law, as the same was likely to be dismissed. The application had reached the stage of the evidence and was withdrawn