SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1263

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MUNIZA BEGUM@JAHAN ARA – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 19th January, 2026 + W.P.(C) 11652/2024, CM APPL. 48394/2024 & CM APPL.

62993/2024 MUNIZA BEGUM@JAHAN ARA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samman Vardhan Gautam, Ms.

Khushi Sharma, Mr. Priyam Tiwari and Ms. Anshika Pryadarshini, Advocates.

versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu and Ms. Ishika Jain, Advocates for R-1.

Mr. Aurangzeb Khan and Mr. Ahmad Parvez, Advocates for R-2.

Mr. Ayush Gupta, Advocate for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking setting aside of the de-sealing order dated 8th January, 2024 and the impugned order dated 13th June, 2024 passed by the respondent no.1/ Municipal Corporation of Delhi (‘MCD’). Further direction is sought against the respondent no.1 to demolish the unauthorized construction of 4th and 5th Floor of the property bearing No. 14, Khasra No. 176, Lane No.1, Johri Farm, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi – 110025 (hereinafter the ‘subject property’).

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the unauthorized construction has been carried by the respondents no.2 and 3 of the 4th and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top