$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 14^th January, 2026 Uploaded on: 20^th January, 2026 + RFA(COMM) 577/2025 & CM APPL. 64360/2025 RANJEET SAINI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ujjwal Jha, Mr. Kartavya Batra &

Mr. Rohan Gupta, Advs.

(8235256364)

versus M/S BANWARILAL ARORA AND SONS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Devansh Dua, Adv.

(9896181187)

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 96 and Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed challenging the impugned judgment dated 19^th May, 2025 passed by the District Judge (Commercial Court-01) North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in CS(Comm.) No. 381/2020. Vide the impugned judgement the suit preferred by the Respondent/Plaintiff has been decreed in the following terms:

“RELIEF:

20. In view of my finding given on the above said issues, plaintiff shall be entitled, against the defendant, to a decree for a sum of Rs.20,49,632/- which is the principal outstanding amount. Plaintiff shall also be entitled to interest @ 9% on the amou