SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1283

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRIYANSHU RAJ – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 08.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 18334/2025, CM APPL. 75914/2025, CM APPL.

79175/2025 PRIYANSHU RAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava and Mr. Hardik Vashisht, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra Solanki, CGSC, Mr. Siddharth Bajaj and Ms.

Maanya Saxena, Advs. for UOI/R-1 Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Mr. Shekhar Vya and Ms. Neha Warrier, Advs for UPSC CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction thereby setting aside the Physical Standard Test (‘PST’) rejection slip dated 17.11.2025 disqualifying Petitioner from appearing for Physical Efficiency Test (‘PET’) in Central Armed Police Forces (Assistant Commandants), Examination 2025 and declare the Petitioner eligible for PET by extending the benefit of relaxation to Petitioner as contemplated under Clause 2(d) of the Revised Guidelines for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top