SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1366

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 353/2026 RAJENDRA KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhatia, Mr. Sunita and Ms. Komal, Advocates.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Insp. Raj Kumar Pal.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 026/2025 under Sections 308/318(4)/319/340 BNS, 2023 (corresponding 383/384/385/386/387/388/389/420/416/419/470/471 IPC) registered at P.S.

Special Cell on 04.07.2025.

2. The facts in brief are that complainant-Vijay Kumar Kathuria, who is in his seventies, reported about online financial fraud amounting to Rs. 1,38,18,100/-. He revealed that some unknown persons, who were impersonating as IPS Officers from Mumbai Police, had placed him under ‘digital arrest’, alleging that the complainant was involved in some money-laundering case.

3. The foremost reason assigned for the grant of anticipatory bail is that the alleged cheated amount has been transferred to an account belonging to M/s Fox Care Technology Pvt. Ltd., in which one Mr. Sayed Solef Ulla is the D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top