SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1379

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAMAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28.01.2026 + ARB.P. 397/2025 RAMAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Mishra, Mr. Sahil and Mr. Nidish, Advocates.

versus MS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K.

Seth and Ms. Palak Mathur, Advocates. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % J U D G E M E N T (Oral)

1. The present Petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Act, has been filed seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dated

20.12.2022, MoU

2. The MoU contains the Arbitration Clause at Clauses 11 and 12, which read as under: “11. Dispute Resolution Any disputes or differences involving this MOU whenever arising shall be resolved mutua ly by the both parties within 30 days of receipt of the written notice that regard from the aggrieved party. Failing amicable settlement, the matter shall be resolved through an arbitration tribunal comprising of sole arbitrator appointed by mutual consent by the parties hereto and in the event of the parties fail to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top