$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23.01.2026 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 28/2025 & CM APPL. 33462/2025 RAVI AGGARWAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Naveen Malhotra and Mr.

Ritvik Malhotra, Advocates.

versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)

1. This appeal has been filed under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2017 [hereinafter, “PMLA Act”], challenging the order dated 17^th March, 2025 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange Management Act/SAFEMA/NDPS/PMLA, New Delhi in FPA PMLA

1908/DLI/2017.

2. One of the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that there was no order passed under Section 20(1) of the PMLA Act, and therefore, the entire proceedings were without jurisdiction. He submits that this legal position has been accepted by this Court vide its judgment in Anirudh Pratap Agarwal vs. Enforcement of Directorate [Neutral Citation No. 2025:DHC:8652-

DB], observing as under:-

“34. Section 20 is the crucial link between search and seizure under Secti