SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S ASHA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD THROUGH SHRI VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA DIRECTOR – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN PREFAB LTD & ANR. – Respondent


$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 19.01.2026 + ARB.P. 127/2024 M/S ASHA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD THROUGH SHRI VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA DIRECTOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Adv.

versus HINDUSTAN PREFAB LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Nischal & Ms. Saira Tagra, Advs. for R-1.

Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Additional Advocate General, State of Haryana with Ms. Nidhi Narwal & Ms. Srishti Jain, Advs. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Act, for the appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon a commercial dispute between the parties.

Signature Not Verified

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner has approached this Court invoking Clause 26 of the Special Conditions of Contract [“SCC”] read with Clause 25 of the General Condition of Contract [“GCC”].

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that there is no requirement to follow the pre-arbitration procedure which is set out in Clause 25 of the GCC. The said clause is reproduced as under:

SETTLEMENT OF

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top