SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1567

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHEFALI VARMA VS. MEENAKSHI VARMA


$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 40/2024 & I.A. 1036/2024 SONIA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aakash Pathak, Adv.

versus SMT. DAYA KAUR & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Mohammad Ali, Mr. Ashwini Kumar Gupta, Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta and Ms. Pushpa Singh, Advs.

for D-1 and D-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 29.01.2026 I.A. 16433/2025 (under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of plaint)

1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking amendment to the plaint. The plaintiff is wife of Late Fateh Singh, who was the son of Late Khachedu Ram, who owned two suit properties.

2. Mr. Aakash Pathak, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of plaintiff submits that the present suit has been filed seeking partition and permanent injunction of said two suit properties as detailed in the plaint.

3. He contends that in the written statement filed by the defendants, a Will dated 20.05.2015 allegedly executed by the late husband of the plaintiff namely, late Fateh Singh has been set up by the defendants, which has necessitated the filing of present application. It is the case of the defendants that by way of his said Will Lat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top