SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1585

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANUP KUMAR RAMPAL VS. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.


$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1141/2026 MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M S Jadhav, Advocate.

versus SPECIAL TASK FORCE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu and Mr. Harsh Vashisht, Advocates for STF.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SPC with Mr.

Sunil Advocate for UoI.

Mr. Kumar Shashwat Singh Sawno, Standing Counsel with Mr. Vishal Singh and Mr. Kartikay Trivedi, Advocates for MCD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

O R D E R

% 28.01.2026

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.

2. The proceedings of the instant Public Interest Litigation Petition have been instituted in respect of certain alleged illegal and unauthorized constructions adjoining ‘Moth Ki Masjid’, which, according to the Petitioner, is a protected monument and in terms of the provisions of the Delhi Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 2004 and other connected laws, no construction in the prohibited area is permissible.

3. In the wake aforesaid facts, a prayer has been made for issuing appropriate directions to the Respondents to remove the alleged unauthorized constructions.

4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top