$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1149/2025 TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Mr. Rohil Bansal and Mr. Chirayu Preahlad, Advocates.

versus SOHEL ILIYASBHAI DANTROLIYA .....Defendant Through: Defendant-in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 28.01.2026 I.A. 2127/2026

1. This joint application is filed on behalf of the parties to the lis under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording the settlement arrived at between the parties. Terms of the settlement are incorporated in the application, which are extracted hereunder for ease of reference:-

“4. With a view to avoid further litigation, and in the interest of an amicable resolution, the Parties have decided to mutually resolve the present dispute as per the settlement terms set out hereinafter:

a. That going forward, the Defendant undertakes to never use the Plaintiffs’ prior adopted well-known trademarks and brands TATA GLUCO PLUS and TATA GLUCO+ and or any other mark / brand / packaging that may be deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s IP in any form or manner; and b. The Defendant undertakes to pay the Plaintiffs a onetime settlement