$~88 to 104 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7982/2013& CM APPL. 18654/2015, CM APPL. 300/2016

9X MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Petitioners .....Respondent ~89 + W.P.(C) 7983/2013 B4U BROADBAND (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS.....Petitioners versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent ~90 + W.P.(C) 7984/2013 TV VISION LIMITED & ORS .....Petitioners versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent ~91 + W.P.(C) 7985/2013 SUN TV NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent ~92 + W.P.(C) 7987/2013 E 24 GLAMORU LIMITED .....Petitioner versus ~93 + W.P.(C) 7988/2013 PIONEER CHANNEL FACTORY PVT. LTD .....Petitioner ~94 + W.P.(C) 7989/2013& CM APPL. 4541/2014, CM APPL.

74139/2025 M/S NEWS BRADCASTER ASSOCIATION &ORS.....Petitioners versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent ~95 + W.P.(C) 4307/2021& CM APPL. 20632/2021 NEWS BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION ORS.....Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent ~96 + W.P.(C) 276/2014& CM APPL. 5897/2014 SARTHAK ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATROY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent ~97 + W.P.(C) 544/2014 CELEBRITIES MANAGEMENT PVT LTD & ANR......Petitioners versus ~98 + W.P.(C) 312/2014 KALAIGNAR TV PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner ~99 + W.P.(C) 724/2014 EENADU TELEVISION PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents ~100 + W.P.(C) 739/2014 RAJ TELEVISION PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents ~101 + W.P.(C) 1150/2014& CM APPL. 2408/2014 M/S. MAA TELEVISION NETWORK LIMITED .....Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent ~102 + W.P.(C) 2944/2014 MEDIAWATCH - INDIA ( A REGISTERED SOCIETY)

.....Petitioner versus ~103 + W.P.(C) 3804/2014& CM APPL. 7659/2014 M/S. NDTV LIFESTYLE LIMITED AND ANR. .....Petitioners ~104 + W.P.(C) 6602/2014 ODISHA TELEVISION LIMITED .....Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Advocate for Petitioner:

Mr. Arvind Datar, Sr. Adv., along with Ms. Nisha Bhambhani, Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Rahul Unnikrishnan & Ms. Mariya Shahab, Advs.

(M: 9711285059)

Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu and Mr.

Tribhuvan, Advs. (M: 9318457835)

Mr. Maanav Kumar & Ms. Shivanjali Bhalerao, Advs. (M:

9406545560)

Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Mr. Rohan Dewan and Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advs.

Mr. Kunal Tandon, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Aanchal Tandon, Ms. Natasha, Mr. N Aggarwal & Ms. Niharika Sharma, Advs.

Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kartikay Dutta, Ms.

Raghavi Shukla, Advs.

Advocate for Respondents:

Mr. Vikram Jetly, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Shreya Jetly and Ms.

Khyaati Bansal, Advs. for UOI. (M: 9871049740)

Mr. Tushar Mehta, SGI with Mr. Ashish Mehta, Mr. Bharat Sethi, Mr.

Abhishek Bhaduri and Mr. Ashish Mehta, Advs. for TRAI.

Mrs. Payal Kakra, Mr. Pranav, Mr. Veerashwar Singh Jadaun, Mr. Pranjal Singh, Advs for Intervenor (Discovery Communication India)

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

O R D E R

% 27.01.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. Subject to orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list this matter before another Bench of which one of us (Prathiba M. Singh, J.) is not a member, on

12^th February, 2026.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J MADHU JAIN, J JANUARY 27, 2026 dj/ck