SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1725

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ASHVAL VADERAA VS. KANISHKA VADERAA & ANR.
CS(OS) 76/2026



$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 76/2026, I.A. 2101/2026 & I.A. 2102/2026 VIJENDRA KUMAR VATS .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jai Krishna Singh, Ms. Preeti, Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vijender Kumar Vats, Advocates (M:9818060585)

versus SMT RANJEETA UPADHAYA AND ANR. .....Defendants Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 27.01.2026 I.A. 2102/2026

1. The present is an application under Section 149 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking extension of time to deposit the outstanding Court Fees.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that time of four weeks be granted to deposit the balance amount of Court Fees.

3. Accordingly, libertyis granted.

4. Let the requisite Court Fees be deposited, within a period of four weeks, from today.

5. Noting the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of.

CS(OS) 76/2026

6. Let the plaint be registered as suit.

7. Issue summons to the defendants, through all permissible modes.

8. The summons shall state that the written statement(s) shall be filed by the defendants, within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of summons. Along with the written statement(s), the defendants shall also file affidavit(s) of admission/denial of the documents of the plaintiff, without which, the written statement(s) shall not be taken on record.

9. Liberty is given to the plaintiff to file replication(s), if any, within thirty (30) days from the receipt of the written statement(s). Along with the replication(s), filed by the plaintiff, the affidavit(s) of admission/denial of the documents of defendants, be filed by the plaintiff, without which, the replication(s) shall not be taken on record.

10. It is made clear that any unjustified denial of documents may lead to an order of costs against the concerned party.

11. If any of the parties wish to seek inspection of the documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines.

12. List before the Joint Registrar on 30th March, 2026, for completion of service.

13. List before the Court on 15th May, 2026.

I.A. 2101/2026 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC)

14. The present suit has been filed seeking specific performance of Agreement to Sell dated 03rd June, 2025, and direction to the defendant no. 1 to execute a Sale Deed in favour of the plaintiff for the property/land comprising of Khasra Nos. 72/3/2(1-)18, 4(4-16), 5 Min(1-06) admeasuring 08 bighas situated in Revenue Estate of village Karal, Tehsil, Khanjawala, Delhi-110081 (subject property).

15. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the defendant no. l is the resident of Lucknow and she is the absolute owner of the suit property. The defendant no. 2 is the resident of Sonepat, Haryana. Both were known to each other much before the plaintiff came in their contact. The plaintiff came to know of the defendant no. 2 only through the defendant no. l when the plaintiff approached the defendant no. l for the purchase of the 4000 sq.

yards of the suit property.

16. It is submitted that a joint Agreement to Sell of the aforesaid suit property was executed on 03rd June, 2025 by the plaintiff and the defendant no. 2 as two respective buyers of the suit property (8 bighas) and the defendant no. l as a seller/vendor of the suit property, for a total consideration of Rs 10.75 Crores, of which the plaintiff and the defendant no. 2 had equal obligation to pay half of the above Rs 10.75 Crores for their equal share of the suit property.

17. It is submitted that the total payment made so far to the defendant no. l and her associates by the plaintiff and the defendant no. 2 respectively are Rs. 5,76,00,000/- and Rs. 50,00,000/-, totaling to Rs. 6,26,00,000/-, of which Rs. 3,55,00,000/- has been paid by the defendant no. 2 and Rs. 2,71,00,000/- has been paid by the plaintiff. The above payments have been duly acknowledged in the said Agreement to Sell, except the last payment of Rs 50,00,000/-, which has not been mentioned in the said Agreement, but the same has be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top