SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1810

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR AKIRA DESAI ALIAS AKIRA NANDAN VS. SAMBHAWAAMI STUDIOS LLP & ORS.
CS(COMM) 71/2026



$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 71/2026, I.A. 2042/2026, I.A. 2043/2026, I.A. 2044/2026 I.A. 2045/2026, I.A. 2046/2026 & I.A. 2047/2026 MEDIAMONKS MULTIMEDIA HOLDING B.V .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr.

Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Karan Kamra and Mr. Arpit Pundir, Advs.

versus SYSTEMRY GLOBAL TECH (OPC) PVT. LTD .....Defendant Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 23.01.2026 I.A. 2044/2026 (Exemption)

1. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) for exemption from filing clear copies of dim documents.

2. The clear and typed/translated copies of the documents with proper margins of the dim annexures be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the defendants.

3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 2043/2026 (Additional Documents)

4. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the CPC as applicable to Commercial Suits under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (“CC Act”) seeking leave to place on record additional documents.

5. The plaintiff is permitted to file additional documents in accordance with the provisions of the CC Act and the Delhi High Court (Original Side)

Rules, 2018.

6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 2045/2026 (Exemption from Pre-Institution Mediation)

7. This is an application filed by the plaintiff seeking exemption from instituting Pre-Litigation Mediation under Section 12A of the CC Act.

8. As the present matter contemplates urgent interim relief, in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi: (2024) 5 SCC 815, exemption from the requirement of pre-institution Mediation is granted.

9. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 2046/2026 (Extension of Time to File Court Fees)

10. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 149 read with Section 151 of the CPC, seeking exemption from payment of Court Fees at the time of the filing of the Suit.

11. Considering the submissions made in the present application, time of ten days is granted for affixing the Court Fees.

12. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 2047/2026 (Extension of Time for Filing Affidavit)

13. This is an application under Section 63(4)(C) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 filed on behalf of plaintiff seeking extension of time for filing affidavit.

14. Considering the submissions made in the present application, time of two weeks is granted to file the said affidavit.

15. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 2042/2026 (Stay)

16. This is an Application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC seeking ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendant.

17. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands having its registered office at Oude Amersfoortseweg 125, 1212 AA Hilversum, Netherlands. The plaintiff claims that the plaintiff, incorporated in the year 2001 is engaged in the business of inter alia providing digital services, advertising, marketing, media, technology and software services. The plaintiff further claims that the plaintiff has its office in fifty-seven cities and thirty-three countries across the globe.

18. The plaintiff claims that it has first adopted and commenced use of the trademark “MediaMonks” for all its business activities in the year 2001 and has been using the said mark continuously and uninterruptedly since its first adoption. It further claims that it was the first company to have the motivation to conceptualize and ideate the use of words “Media” and “Monks” jointly to form phonetically, visually and structurally distinctive trademark “MediaMonks”.

19. The plaintiff states that in India, the plaintiff first launched their business activities under the mark “MediaMonks” in the year 2019. It is also the claim of the plaintiff that in July 2024, the plaintiff commence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top