SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1930

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NARESH KUMAR PAL VS. AIR INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD. & OTHERS


$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4824/2025 Y.P. SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Dhawan and Mr. Mohit Miglani, Advocate with Petitioner in person. versus UNION BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. O.P. Gaggar and Mr. Sachindra Karn, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 29.01.2026

1. The Petitioner joined the services of the Respondent Bank as a Clerk on 9th July, 1971 and was promoted to the cadre of Officer with effect from 1st October, 1984. In the year 1993, a memorandum of charges was issued to him and disciplinary proceedings were initiated. Upon conclusion of the inquiry, the Disciplinary Authority, by order dated 11th February, 2000, imposed the penalty of dismissal from service. The Petitioner’s statutory appeal and review were rejected.

2. Aggrieved, the Petitioner instituted W.P.(C) 2167/2002. During its pendency, by interim order dated 21st December, 2016, this Court directed reconsideration of the quantum of punishment, while recording concern that dismissal had the effect of wiping out retiral benefits earned across nearly three decades. The Bank thereafter passed an order dated 15th April, 2017 maintaining th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top