Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TALIM AHMAD VS. MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 939/2026 & CM APPL. 4602/2026, CM APPL. 4603/2026 DALIP SINGH AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Suresh Chandra Nagar, Mr. Sahil Azam, Mr. Vivek Janmeda, Mr. Mukeem Chauhan, Ms. Simran Jaspal, Ms. Sakshi Jaiswal, Ms. Ruchiba & Mr. Debaditya Dutta, Advocates with petitioners in-person.
versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj (CGSC)
along with Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. T. Singhdev along with Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty and Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 22.01.2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners who are advocates, challenging the Circular dated 14th January, 2026 issued by the respondent no. 3/ Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) debarring advocates who had failed to submit their online verification form on the BCD web portal on or before 30th November, 2025 from being included in the voters list for the ensuing BCD elections to be held in February 2026.
2. The Supreme Court vide order dated 18th November, 2025 in W.P.(C) 1319/2019 titled M. Varadhan v. Union of India & Anr. had passed d
Election disqualification rules must be interpreted purposefully to uphold institutional integrity, and courts exercise limited judicial review over election-related decisions unless egregious errors....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
