$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 63/2026 BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Karan Luthra, Mr. Ankit Banati, Ms. Aarushi Tiku, Mr. Piyush Thanvi, Advocates.

versus MANISH SINGH @ SETTLEMENT GURU & ORS.....Defendants Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr.

Akshay Sharma, G.P, Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Ms.

Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for UOI.

Mr. Ankit Parhar and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates for D-3 (X Corp.)

Mr. Neel Mason, Ms. Ekta Sharma, Mr. Udit Tewari, Ms. Surabhi Katare, Advocates for D-4/Google LLC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 22.01.2026 I.A. 1852/20262026 (Additional Documents)

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) as applicable to commercial suits under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (“CC Act”) seeking leave to place on record additional documents.

2. As prayed, the plaintiff is permitted to file additional documents in accordance with the provisions of the CC Act and the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 within thirty (30) days.

3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 1853/2026 (Pre-Institution Mediation)

4. This is an application filed by the plaintiff seeking exemption from Pre-

Institution Mediation under Section 12A of the CC Act.

5. As the present matter contemplates urgent interim relief, in light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi, (2024) 5 SCC 815, exemption from the requirement of Pre-

Institution Mediation is granted.

6. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 1854/2026 2026 (Exemption from filing legible/certified copies)

7. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Section 151 of the CPC seeking exemption from filing original/certified, typed, translated from vernacular and illegible copies of the documents.

8. For the reasons stated therein, exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

9. The clear, original, certified, typed, translated and legible copies of the documents upon which they seek to place reliance, be filed within four weeks.

10. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 1855/2026 (seeking leave to file certain documents on a CD/pendrive) 11. This application has been filed by plaintiff seeking permission to place on record CD/pendrive containing video clips of defendants’ infringing activities.

12. For the reasons stated therein, the same is allowed. The CD/pendrive be filed within two weeks and be taken on record.

13. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 1851/2026 (Stay)

14. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2, CPC seeking ad interim injunction against the defendants.

15. Plaintiff is a public limited company incorporated under the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956 and a company under Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, having its office at 11^th Floor, Aggarwal Metro Heights, Netaji Subhash Place, Pitampura, New Delhi. The plaintiff is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC-D) registered with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Plaintiff is engaged in the business of lending and acceptance of public deposits apart from a diversified lending portfolio across retail, SMEs and commercial customers across India. Such services are claimed to have commenced from the year 2007. Plaintiff claims to have a current loan book of Rs.36.37 million and is rated as “AAA” by CRISIL, ICRA and CARE.

16. Plaintiff claims to be a part of the Bajaj Group which has a presence in automotive, finance, home appliance sectors etc. The plaintiff claims that “Bajaj” has become a well-known household name and enjoys excellent goodwill and reputation in the market. The plaintiff’s networth is claimed to be more than Rs.96,700 Crores as on 31.03.2025 and a balance sheet size of Rs.3,67,869.56 Crores as on 31.03.2025.

17. Plaintiff claims to have been accorded many awards which are enlisted in para 15 of the p