SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2134

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
UTKAL GRAMEEN BANK VS. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES AND ANR.


$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16063/2024 M/S RECKON MARKETING SERVICES THROUGH PROPRIETOR MR NIRAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Sharma, Mr. Aryan Chanda, Advocates versus MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms Anju Gupta,Mr Bhuvan Goel,Mr Shubham Grover advocate (s) for UOI.

Mr. Amit Acharya, GP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 21.01.2026

1. The petitioner had approached the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, South East, New Delhi under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“the Act”). By the Impugned Order, the petitioner has been informed that its application under Sections 18 has been rejected by the Council. The said order was communicated to the petitioner vide email dated 11.09.2024, which for the sake of clarity, is extracted as under:

“Dear NIRAJ KUMAR, Your Application Rejected by Facilitation Council MSEF Council District (South-East). Please find below information:

Rejection Remark: Correct Documents not Attached Facilitation Council: MSEF Council District (South-East) Application Reference No. (Temporary): UD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top