SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2136

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SONIA AND ANR VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NORTH & ORS.


$~108 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3047/2025, CM APPL. 14454/2025 & CM APPL.

19563/2025 SOCIETY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES THR ITS PRESIDENT PARVESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Singh, Mr. Shubhendu Saxena, Ms. Niharika, Advocates.

versus NARINDER SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Chouhan, Mr. Ujjwal Singh Parmar, Mr. Sujay Chhikara and Ms. Neha Raj Singh, Advs.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 21.01.2026

1. Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. He vehemently submits that looking at all facts and circumstances, more importantly, the repeated observations made by the Court that the respondents do not have authority to call themselves as the officer bearers of the petitioner society, the prayer made in the instant petition deserves to be allowed.

3. He also places reliance on a decision of the Uttarakhand High Court in the case of Sherwood Diocesan College Society v. Deputy Registrar of Firms and Others., 2021 SCC OnLine Utt 150 According to him, the said decision was not interfered with by the Supreme Court in a Special Leave Petition preferr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top