$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 65/2026 TIGER RAPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Dinesh Kothari, Advocate.

versus A. RAJENDRAN .....Respondent Through: Counsel for Respondent (appearance not given) CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 21.01.2026 CM APPL. 4059/2026 (Exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The Application stands disposed of.

RFA 65/2026

3. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant, Tiger Rapta, against the Judgment and decree dated 13.10.2025 of learned District Judge-04, Delhi whereby the Application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and Leave to Defend Application filed by the Appellant in Civil Suit of the Respondent under Order XXXVII CPC, 1908, has been dismissed and the Suit for Recovery of Rs.10,00,000/- has been decreed, vide Judgment dated 13.10.2025.

4. The Plaintiff had filed a Civil Suit for Recovery of Rs.10,00,000/- being the amount of two cheques of Rs.5,00,000/- each dated 05.02.2020, which had been issued in favour of the Respondent. The Plaintiff/Respondent asser