$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 914/2023, CM APPL. 59003/2023 (stay)

SANDHYA VERMA & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Karan Luthra, Advocate.

versus SHIV CHARAN VERMA .....Respondent Through: Counsel for Respondent (appearance not given). CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 21.01.2026 RFA 914/2023

1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) has been filed on behalf of the Appellants, to challenge the Judgment and Order dated 25.07.2023 passed by the learned ADJ-04, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby the Suit of the Respondent/Plaintiff had been decreed for Possession and unauthorised user charges @ Rs.5,000/- per month, till the peaceful and vacant possession was handed over to the Plaintiff/Respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the Appellants submits that the possession has been handed over by the Appellant on 31.03.2024. The only grievance that survives in the present Appeal is in respect of Mesne Profits. It is submitted that the Appellant is the son of the Respondent, who since birth had been residing with him. The property in question is a