SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2208

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S ARCHITECT VISTASP AND ASSOCIATES AND ANR. VS. M/S MODI INFOSOL PVT. LTD.


$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(COMM) 327/2025 RADHEY SHYAM GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Mr. Ateev Mathur &Mr. Ritwik Singh, Advs.

versus PUNJAB AND SIND BANK ....Respondent Through: Ms. Seema Gupta, Adv.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

O R D E R

% 20.01.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant – Radhey Shyam Gupta under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, inter alia, assailing the judgment dated 22nd March, 2025 (hereinafter, ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the District Judge (Commercial)-07 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS (COMM.) No. 542/2023 titled, Radhey Shyam Gupta v. Punjab and Sind Bank.

3. TheAppellantwasthePlaintiffandthelandlordofthepropertybearing no. 2612-13, Zere Fasil, Naya Bazar, Delhi-110006 (hereinafter, ‘Subject Premises’). Vide the impugned judgment, the suit was decreed in favour of the Plaintiff/Appellant.

4. The Appellant has preferred the present appeal challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 22nd March, 2025 to the extent that it has not granted the mesne profits in terms of what the Appellant had demanded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top