SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2252

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NIRANJAN GOGOI VS. INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND AUTHORITY & ORS.


$~100 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 766/2026 TAURANT PROJECTS LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Gandhi and Ms. Jyoti Nambiar, Advs.

versus GAIL INDIA LTD .....Respondent Through: Ratan Kumar Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Ms. Ritika Priya and Mr. Siddharth Singh Advocates. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 20.01.2026 CM APPL. 3734/2026

1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 766/2026 and CM APPL. 3733/2026

3. The petitioner seeks to challenge the procedural order dated 26.11.2025 passed by the Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter ‘the Arbitral Tribunal’). By way of the impugned order, the Arbitral Tribunal has disposed of the applications filed by the petitioner on 21.11.2025.

4. The first application was to seek leave of the Arbitral Tribunal to place/ bring on record the additional documents of 1040 pages. The second application was filed for grant of two weeks’ time to the petitioner to place on record additional affidavit of evidence of CW-1, Dinesh Lalwani.

5. The facts would indicate that the similar prayer sought by the petitioner, was earlier dismissed by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top