SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2261

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VINEET KUMAR VS. AMIT KUMAR & ANR.


$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 1188/2025, CM APPL. 82301/2025, CM APPL. 82302/2025 &

CM APPL. 82303/2025 ANJU & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Joby P Varghese and Ms. Rashi, Advocates versus MAHESH PANWAR .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 20.01.2026

1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 („CPC‟) has been filed to challenge the Judgment dated 08.10.2025 which has decreed the Suit for recovery against the Appellant in the sum of Rs.5 lacs along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the Suit till the actual realization.

2. The brief facts are that the Plaintiff was the uncle of Rakesh Panwar, deceased husband of Appellant No. 1 and father of Defendants No. 2 and 3, and had cordial relationship with the deceased. On the request of Rakesh Panwar, the Respondent/Plaintiff agreed to advance a friendly loan of Rs.5 lacs out of which, Rs.4,87,500/- has been given through Cheque No. 000030 dated 26.05.2016 and Rs.12,500/- in cash. The deceased Rakesh Panwar, in order to secure the repayment, had issued a post dated cheque bearing No. 929629 dated 09.03.2017 for Rs.5 lacs d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top