SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2271

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MADHU BEDI VS. MADHU BHANDARI & ORS.


$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 791/2025 & I.A. 1568/2026 CAPITAL LAND BUILDERS PVT. LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Amreen Khaliq, Advocate with Mr. Manoj Bansal, A.R.

Mob: 9899645472 Email: advamreenkhaliq@gmail.com versus RAJNEESH CHHABRA .....Defendant Through: Mr. Sushila, Advocate, along with defendant in person (through VC)

Mr. Ashish Negi, Adv. for Pushpanjali Company (through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 20.01.2026 I.A. 1568/2026

1. The present application has been filed under Order XXIII Rule 3, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), on behalf of the defendant and the plaintiff for passing a compromise decree in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

2. The terms of the settlement have been detailed in paragraph 3 of the present application, which are reproduced as under:

“xxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxx”

3. Learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that the parties to the suit have entered into settlement on their own volition and without any threat, pressure, coercion or undue influence from any side, whatsoever.

4. Parties are present in the Court, and confirm to the settlement arrive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top