SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2292

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED VS. M/S VALLABH SAREE EMPORIUM & ORS.


$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1857/2025 HONASA CONSUMER LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Udian Sharma, Advocate through video-conferencing.

versus RDV DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aayush Gautam, Advocate through video-conferencing.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 20.01.2026

1. The present Petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], has been filed seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Vendor Agreement dated 29.05.2023 [“Agreement”] .

2. Clause 13.3 of the Vendor Agreement, which contains the arbitration clause, reads as follows:

13.3. If any dispute arises between the Parties hereto during the subsistence of this Agreement or thereafter, in connection with, or arising out of, this Agreement, the dispute shall be referred to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Indian) to be adjudicated by a sole arbitrator to be appointed by Purchaser. Arbitration shall be held at Delhi India. The proceedings of arbitration shall be in the English language. The arbit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top