IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED VS. M/S VALLABH SAREE EMPORIUM & ORS.
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1857/2025 HONASA CONSUMER LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Udian Sharma, Advocate through video-conferencing.
versus RDV DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aayush Gautam, Advocate through video-conferencing.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 20.01.2026
1. The present Petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], has been filed seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Vendor Agreement dated 29.05.2023 [“Agreement”] .
2. Clause 13.3 of the Vendor Agreement, which contains the arbitration clause, reads as follows:
“13.3. If any dispute arises between the Parties hereto during the subsistence of this Agreement or thereafter, in connection with, or arising out of, this Agreement, the dispute shall be referred to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Indian) to be adjudicated by a sole arbitrator to be appointed by Purchaser. Arbitration shall be held at Delhi India. The proceedings of arbitration shall be in the English language. The arbit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.