SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2344

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NARENDRA KUMAR VS. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) AND ANR


$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 651/2023 & CM APPLs. 2521/2023, 15294/2023 DIVAKAR NANDAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC with Ms.

Maanya Saxena, Mr. Siddharth Bajaj, Advocates for R-1.

Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul Batra, Mr. Kundan Kumar Mishra, Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Advocates for R-2 & 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 19.01.2026

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution assails a termination notice dated 16th December, 2022 issued by Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited (Respondent No. 3). The Petitioner also seeks a declaration that Clause 5(b) of the appointment letter dated 1st April, 2010, which permits termination by either side on three months’ notice or salary in lieu thereof, is unconstitutional and void.

The background

2. The Petitioner was appointed as Scientist-I in the R&D Division of Respondent No. 3 with effect from 1st April, 2010. The appointment letter contemplated an initial probation. The appointment letter further recorded the age of superannuation as 58 years and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top