SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2353

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S TECHNOMEN PROP. SH. SANJEEV KUMAR VS. SH. GAUTAM & ANR.


$~4 and 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7727/2019, CM APPL. 32049/2019, CM APPL. 42709/2021 and CM APPL. 797/2023 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Divya Swamy, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh and Mr.Shikhar Rusia, Advocates versus SATISH & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate + W.P.(C) 1527/2023 SH SATISH KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Dr. Divya Swamy, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh and Mr.Shikhar Rusia, Advocates CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 19.01.2026

1. Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, learned counsel for the workmen/claimants/ respondents, submits that in the present case, the impugned award dated 01.02.2019 directed the management/MCD/petitioner to reinstate the workmen with 60% back wages. He submits that though the impugned award was stayed, however, on an application filed under Section 17-B of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, this Court vide order dated 30.11.2022, directed the management to pay to the respondents, minimum wages or last drawn wages, whic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top