SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2360

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VIKAS NAGAR VS. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & ORS.


$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13989/2025, CM APPL. 61355/2025 & CM APPL.

61414/2025 ANADISH KUMAR PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prasanna S. and Ms. Mythili S.

Advs. versus NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION .....Respondent Through: None.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 19.01.2026

1. The petitioner makes a solitary/primary grievance that the complaint by the NHRC has been closed without affording him the opportunity of hearing.

2. The petitioner had approached the National Human Rights Commission [‘NHRC’] owing to an incident which had occurred on 10.05.2022, where, the petitioner opposed the stationing of guards by Resident Welfare Association of Vaishali’s [‘RWA’], due to safety concerns for his daughter.

3. Following the purportedly false complaint by RWA, the petitioner alleges that he was physically abused in public by Sh. Mukesh Kumar, SHO of Maurya Enclave Police Station. He was forcefully taken into custody and was subjected to physical and verbal torture resulting in losing his consciousness.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner’s release was ordered the following day by the Special Executive Magistrate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top