Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARPREET KAUR VS. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
$~25 & 26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SOMVIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju and Mr Nilansh Gaur, Adv.
versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Vishruti Pandey, Mr.
Sachin Garg, Advs for R-1 and 2.
26 + W.P.(C) 6980/2023 SOMVIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju and Mr Nilansh Gaur, Adv.
versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Vishruti Pandey, Mr.
Sachin Garg, Advs for R-1 and 2.
CORAM: O R D E R % 19.01.2026
1. The fate of this petition and prayers will depend upon the conclusion of the enquiry and the action of the respondent employer.
2. Accordingly, leaving all rights and conte
The Internal Complaints Committee lacks jurisdiction under the Sexual Harassment Act when allegations do not qualify as sexual harassment within its definition.
The jurisdiction of the Internal Complaints Committee under the POSH Act extends beyond the respondent's workplace, allowing for inquiries at the aggrieved woman's workplace, thus upholding the Act's....
Inquiries under the Sexual Harassment Act must be conducted where witnesses reside to ensure fairness, and parties must exhaust appellate remedies before seeking judicial review.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of complying with the statutory provisions and principles of natural justice in cases of alleged sexual harassment at the workpla....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of conducting a regular inquiry before imposing major penalties and enabling the employee to establish innocence in cases of sexual harassment at workplaces.
The court emphasized the importance of an independent departmental inquiry and the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article