$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2150/2025 MD JUNAID .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Saini, Advocate via video-

conferencing.

Petitioner in-person.

versus STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State alongwith Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr Ashivini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocates.

Respondent No.2 in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 12.01.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 104/2025 dated 19.02.2025 registered under sections 3 & 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 at P.S.:

Jamia Nagar, South-East Delhi.

2. Sections 3 & 4 of the Act read as under :

3. Talaq to be void and illegal.—Any pronouncement of talaq by a Muslim husband upon his wife, by words, either spoken or written or in electronic form or in any other manner whatsoever, shall bevoidandillegal.

4. Punishment for pronouncing talaq.—Any Muslim husband who pronounces talaq referred to in Section 3 upon his