SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2553

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
APICAL (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD VS. EPIGRAL LIMITED


$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) 2/2026 & I.A. 588/2026 MR. YOGESH MADAN AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Faisal Naseem, Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Mr. Jitender Chaudhary, Mr. Aditya Pandey and Ms. Mamta Kaushik, Advocates along with petitioner-Yogesh Madan in person.

Mob: 9999140032 versus MRS. ALAKA SUDHIR SHAH @ UMA SHEKHAR HARDAS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Sang Tani, Advocate Mob: 7073621688 Email: nishi.sangtani@gmail.com CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 12.01.2026

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 9(ii)(c) & (d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) for interim measures to restrain the respondent from selling, transferring, alienating or creating third party rights in respect of the property bearing no. G-143, Kalkaji, New Delhi-19, till the pendency of the arbitral proceedings initiated in terms of Clause 13 of the Agreement to Sell, dated 04th September, 2024, between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the tenants of the property bearing no. G-143, Kalkaji, New Delhi-19, belonging to the respondent. Thus, it is submitted that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top