IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
APICAL (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD VS. EPIGRAL LIMITED
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) 2/2026 & I.A. 588/2026 MR. YOGESH MADAN AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Faisal Naseem, Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Mr. Jitender Chaudhary, Mr. Aditya Pandey and Ms. Mamta Kaushik, Advocates along with petitioner-Yogesh Madan in person.
Mob: 9999140032 versus MRS. ALAKA SUDHIR SHAH @ UMA SHEKHAR HARDAS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Sang Tani, Advocate Mob: 7073621688 Email: nishi.sangtani@gmail.com CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 12.01.2026
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 9(ii)(c) & (d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) for interim measures to restrain the respondent from selling, transferring, alienating or creating third party rights in respect of the property bearing no. G-143, Kalkaji, New Delhi-19, till the pendency of the arbitral proceedings initiated in terms of Clause 13 of the Agreement to Sell, dated 04th September, 2024, between the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the tenants of the property bearing no. G-143, Kalkaji, New Delhi-19, belonging to the respondent. Thus, it is submitted that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.