Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Renu Bhatnagar, J
Priti Saraf – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prior judicial order and undertaking governing property vacatur terms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evaluation of medical exigency as grounds for extension. (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. limitation of extending consent decrees versus equitable relief. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
O R D E R
% 08.01.2026
CM APPL. 79138/2025 (seeking extension of time)
1. This is an application filed on behalf of the appellant under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘CPC’) seeking extension of time for compliance of the judgement dated 15.09.2025, by extending the time to vacate the suit property, owing to the medical exigency of the appellant, passed in Regular First Appeal being RFA 868/2025 titled as ‘Priti Saraf v. Ajay Sharma & Ors’.
2. The said Regular First Appeal was disposed of on 15.09.2025, in view of the undertaking given by the appellant. The relevant portion of the said judgment reads as under:
“37. At this stage, during the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions from the appellant, who is also present in the Court submits that the appellant is ready and willing to abide by the impugned J
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
