Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J
Rakesh Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
CPIO Directorate Of Prosecution – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts involving dissatisfaction with information provided under rti. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. requirement to invoke section 20 of the rti act before the information commission for incomplete information. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
O R D E R
1. The petitioner seems to be aggrieved by the non-processing of the full information as directed by the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO).
2. It is the case of the petitioner that vide order dated 05.09.2022, the first appellate authority had upheld the order of the CPIO, whereas, in second appeal, the Central Information Commission (CIC) directed the respondent to furnish the information within 21 days of the order dated 21.06.2023.
3. The petitioner, therefore, submits that though the respondent has furnished the information, but the same is not satisfactory and hence the instant petition has been filed.
4. If the provisions of Section 20 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter ‘the RTI Act’) are perused, the same would clearly indicate that the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, is fully empowered to deal with grievances relating to disclosure
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
