SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2604

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUNIL KUMAR VS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI )


$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1716/2025 RAJEEV .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kartik Kaushik, Mr. Deep Parashar, Mr. Rajeh Dahiya and Mr.

Govind Rishi, Advocates.

versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Arpita Mishra, PS – Vijay Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

O R D E R

% 07.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 38022/2025

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.(BAIL) 2518/2025

3. This application under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C read with Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed seeking suspension of the sentence awarded to the applicant/convict in Sessions Case No. 589 of 2018 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Special Court), North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi. The applicant/accused has been found guilty for the offences punishable under Section 11(iv) read with Section 12 of the PoCSO Act and Section 354D of Vide the IPC. the impugned order on sentence dated 10.12.2025, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and five months along wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top