Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J
Mehmood Ali – Appellant
Versus
Mohd Yaqub Malik – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural compliance regarding stay applications under civil procedure. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. mandatory consideration of court-appointed evidence in execution proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. disposal of interlocutory matters with directions for compliance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 785/2026 (exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
CM APPL. 784/2026 (Stay)
3. The present application under Section 151 of the CPC seeks following prayers:-
“It is there for most respectfully prayed that the impugned order dated 03.01.2026 as passed in the execution proceedings by the Ld. ARC-02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, as well as the execution proceedings bearing Execution Proceedings of the EX. No. 1858 of 2025 pending in the Court of Ld. ARC- 02 Central Tis Hazari Courts Delhi tiled as "Yaqub Malik Vs Mehmood Ali" may kindly be ordered to stay during the pendency of the above noted Petition.
Pass any other further order in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondent as this Hon 'ble Court deem fit and proper.”
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
